规范刑法学视域下医疗事故调查报告适用研究  

Study on the Application of Medical Malpractice Investigation Report from the Perspective of Normative Criminal Law

作　　者：万力 章桦 Wan Li;Zhang Hua

机构地区：[1]西南医科大学法学院

出　　处：《医学与法学》2022年第5期59-64,共6页Medicine and Jurisprudence

基　　金：2021年度四川省社科规划项目“现代性视域下的数量刑法学研究”(项目编号:SC21B168);2019年西南医科大学课程思政示范项目“刑事诉讼法学”(项目编号:SFKC201942)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：据2021年新《刑诉法解释》的规定,医疗事故调查报告具有证据资格;在规范刑法学视域下,其可适用《刑法修正案(十一)》中“积极作为或消极不作为类事故犯罪”类型。而事故调查报告的过程性资料不具备证据资格;最终调查报告书各部分内容的证据资格,也需严格把控,以避免误用、滥用;目前医疗事故调查报告作为证据在刑事诉讼中的适用,也存在行政执法证据化、鉴定意见化和庭审质证单方权利化的风险。鉴此,可采取类鉴定意见的适用方法,明确报告的意见性证据属性,规范报告书的审查,发挥报告所应有的证据效用,建立责任追究倒查机制来化解这些风险。According to the Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law in 2021,the medical malpractice investigation report is qualified as evidence.From the perspective of normative criminal law,it can be applied to the"accident crime of positive act or negative omission"in the Criminal Law Amendment(11).The process data of the accident investigation report does not have the qualification of evidence;The evidence qualification of each part of the final investigation report should also be strictly controlled to avoid misuse and abuse.At present,the application of medical malpractice investigation report as evidence in criminal proceedings also has the risk of evidentialization of administrative law enforcement,appraisal opinionization and unilateral right of trial cross-examination.In view of this,the applicable method of similar appraisal opinion can be adopted to clarify the attribute of opinion evidence of the report,standardize the review of the report,give full play to the evidential effect of the report,and establish the mechanism of reverse liability investigation to resolve these risks.

关 键 词：医疗事故调查报告 规范刑法学 证据价值 类鉴定意见 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]