个人信息保护民事公益诉讼的原告适格——以《个人信息保护法》第70条的解释论为中心  

The Competence of Plaintiff in Civil Public Interest Litigation on Personal Information Protection:Focusing on the Interpretation of Article 70 of the Personal Information Protection Law

作　　者：李晓倩[1] LI Xiao-qian

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,长春130012

出　　处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2022年第5期20-29,235,共11页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目(18CFX074)。

摘　　要：个人信息保护民事公益诉讼原告适格的解释,须从文义出发,综合运用体系解释和目的解释的方法获得妥适的结论。《个人信息保护法》第70条为《民事诉讼法》第58条之特别规定,“检察机关”提起个人信息保护民事公益诉讼不受起诉顺位的限制;“法律规定的消费者组织”仅指向中国消费者协会以及在省、自治区、直辖市设立的消费者协会;“国家网信部门确定的组织”原告资格的确定,须明确“国家网信部门”的层级、“组织”的类型、“确定”的方式、“确定”的标准、“确定”的程序、资质的动态性等。在个人信息保护民事公益诉讼中,检察机关、法律规定的消费者组织、国家网信部门确定的组织并无起诉顺位之别,三者为并列关系。The Article 70 of the Personal Information Protection Law constitutes a special provision of the Article 58 of the Civil Procedure Law,“procuratorial organ”could file civil public interest law suits for the protection of personal information without restriction posed by the order of prosecution;“consumer organization prescribed by law ”only refers to the China Consumers Association and the consumer associations established in provinces,autonomous regions,and municipalities;the plaintiff competence of “organizations determined by the national network information department”depends on the clarification of the type of “organizations”,the level of the“national network information department”,the method of “determination”,the standard of “determination”,the procedure of “determination”,and the dynamics of the competence. In civil public interest litigation on personal information protection,there is no difference in the order of prosecution between procuratorial organs,consumer organizations stipulated by law,and organizations determined by the national network information department,which can be seen as in a parallel relationship.

关 键 词：个人信息保护 公益诉讼 原告适格 检察机关 社会组织 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学] D922.16[政治法律—法学]