检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:穆丽霞[1] 唐洁 MU Lixia;TANG Jie(School of Humanities and Law,China University of Petroleum,Qingdao 266000,China)
机构地区:[1]中国石油大学(华东)文法学院,山东青岛266000
出 处:《长春大学学报》2022年第7期76-79,共4页Journal of Changchun University
基 金:山东省哲学社会科学规划项目(20CFZJ49)。
摘 要:我国司法实践中,被害人极少被主动告知其诉讼权利,参与到诉讼过程中行使权利。我国现行刑事诉讼法,尽管赋予被害人一方诉讼当事人地位,但在大多数财产型犯罪案件中,诉讼程序销蚀掉了被害人与被告人、犯罪嫌疑人之间的冲突,造成了被害人仅被当作一个客体、一个定罪工具。通过剖析被害人在刑事案件中的地位,依据诉讼程序顺序对被害人在司法各阶段的权利救济展开分析。In China’s judicial practice,victims are rarely informed of their litigation rights actively to exercise their rights through participating in the litigation process.In current criminal procedure law,although the victim is given the status of the litigant,the litigation procedure has eroded the conflicts between the victim and the defendant and criminal suspect in most property crime cases,resulting in that the victim is being treated as only an object or a tool for conviction.Based on analyzing the victim’s status in criminal cases,this article analyzes the rights relief for victims at all stages of justice according to the sequence of litigation procedures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.125.201