“孤证不能定案”规则的困境与出路  

Dilemma and Solutions: An Empirical Study on the Rule of “A Verdict Can’t Base on Isolated Evidence”

作　　者：韩旭[1] 夏丽芬 林佳嘉 HAN Xu;XIA Lifen;LIN Jiajia(School of Law,Sichuan University,Chengdu Sichuan,610207,China)

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610207

出　　处：《西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第5期89-97,共9页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：印证主义诉讼模式下催生出的孤证不能定案是刑事司法实践中的潜规则。在司法实务中,孤证不能定案的运用存在着三大缺陷:混淆和错用孤证概念,难以准确界定孤证内涵;以证据数量替代证据质量,忽视对证据证明力的审查;证明形式化,缺少对证据审查的裁判说理。为了打破学界和实务界对孤证不能定案司法潜规则的信奉,修正该规则的内在缺陷,应通过准确界定孤证的概念和类型、明确孤证定案的主体条件和程序条件、运用证据补强规则并附加情态证据以实现孤证认定案件等路径,实现对孤证不能定案规则的重新解读、认知和破解。“A verdict can’t base on isolated evidence”is the hidden rule in the practice of criminal justice. Through an empirical study,we find out the following problems in the application of the rule. First,the concept of“isolated evidence”is misused,which makes it difficult to accurately define the connotation of“isolated evidence”;second,over emphasis on the quantity of evidence results in neglect of the quality of evidence and of the examination of the probative power of evidence;the third is the lack the judgement and reasoning of evidence review. In order to correct the defects of the rule,we suggest reinterpreting,understanding and breaking the rule from the following aspects: first,accurately defining the concept of“isolated evidence”and divide the types of isolated evidence;second,to clarifying the subjective conditions and procedural conditions for the determination of isolated evidence;third,seeking for appropriate methods for determining“isolated evidence”through evidence reinforcement and modal evidence supplementation.

关 键 词：孤证 孤证不能定案 心证 印证证明 证据质量 

分 类 号：DF713[政治法律—诉讼法学]