刑事被告人品格证据的审查与适用——以证据的相关性为视角  

The Review and Application of the Character Evidence of Criminal Defendants:From the Perspective of Evidence Relevance

作　　者：周鸿飞 ZHOU Hongfei(School of Law,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China)

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《湖南工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第5期52-58,共7页Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：刑事诉讼中被告人品格证据的适用,在实践中存在法定证据资格缺失、审查流程虚置等困境。对此,应以刑事被告人品格证据的理论界定为基础,修正品格证据一律不予采用的传统司法观念。具体而言,可以刑事被告人品格证据对特定犯罪行为发挥的证明作用为中心,以其间接证明价值为半径,明确刑事被告人品格证据的初步可采性;并参照域外品格证据审查规则,构建从“单个证据审查”到“多个证据印证”的审查流程。同时,在单个证据审查上应注重品格证据是否与待证事实具有最低的关联性,在多个证据印证审查上应确保品格证据能够与其他证据形成合理印证。In the application of the defendant’s character evidence in criminal proceedings,in practice,there are dilemmas such as the lack of legal evidence qualifications and the review process.In this regard,the traditional judicial concept that all character evidence is not used should be revised based on the theoretical definition of character evidence.The preliminary admissibility of the criminal defendant’s character evidence is clarified by focusing on the proving role of the criminal defendant’s character evidence for specific criminal acts,and taking its indirect probative value as the radius.With the review rules of extraterritorial character evidence as a frame of reference,the review process from"single evidence review"to"multiple evidence verification"is constructed.The review of single evidence should focus on whether the character evidence has the least relevance to the facts to be proven.In multiple evidence corroboration reviews,it should be ensured that character evidence can be reasonably corroborated with other evidence.

关 键 词：刑事被告人 品格证据 间接证据 证明价值 审查适用 

分 类 号：D925.213[政治法律—诉讼法学]