检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王仁强[1] WANG Renqiang(Dictionary Research Center,Sichuan International Studies University,Chongqing 400031,P.R.China)
机构地区:[1]四川外国语大学词典学研究所,重庆市沙坪坝区400031
出 处:《现代外语》2022年第5期634-644,共11页Modern Foreign Languages
摘 要:本文从四个维度对唯科学主义语言学的方法论进行反思。从本体论上看,唯科学主义语言学基于可分性假设,主张个体主义本体论和单层现实观,强调语言的客观实在性,但却忽视了言语主体对语言的建构作用。从逻辑上看,唯科学主义语言学沿袭经典逻辑,但该逻辑仅适用于言语层面的具体实体,不适用于语言层面的抽象实体。从认识论上看,唯科学主义语言学主张还原论、决定论和局部线性因果论,只能解释言语现象,不能解释语言的整体特征。从价值论上看,唯科学主义语言学难以做到知行合一、理实并重。研究表明,语言学亟需走出牛顿思维下的唯科学主义困境,积极拥抱量子思维,从学科研究范式向超学科研究范式转向。This paper reflects on the methodology of scientistic linguistics from four dimensions.Ontologically,scientistic linguistics advocates individualistic ontology and a single level of reality based on the separability hypothesis,emphasizing the objective reality of language while ignoring the constructive role of speakers.Logically,scientistic linguistics follows classical logic,which is valid for the discussion of concrete entities at parole but invalid for the explanation of abstract entities at langue.Epistemologically,scientistic linguistics embraces reductionism,determinism and local linear causality,which can account for speech phenomena but not for the global properties at langue.Axiologically,it is difficult for scientistic linguistics to achieve the unity of theory and practice.Taken together,this research shows that linguistics needs to get out of the scientistic dilemma under Newtonian thinking,and should embrace quantum thinking,thus shifting from disciplinary to transdisciplinary research.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158