检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘淑娜 王志刚 张晓 LIU Shuna;WANG Zhigang;ZHANG Xiao(General Hospital of Pingmei Shenma Medical Group,Pingdingshan,467000)
出 处:《实用癌症杂志》2022年第10期1663-1666,共4页The Practical Journal of Cancer
摘 要:目的 探讨Philips Brilliance iCT和MRI术前诊断直肠癌(rectal cancer,RC)分期的价值。方法 选取92例RC患者作为研究对象,患者均在术前接受Brilliance iCT和MRI扫描检查,将Brilliance iCT和MR检查的TN分期结果与病理学检查结果进行对比分析。结果 与病理学检查结果比较,MRI对直肠癌T分期的准确率为89.13%,高于Brilliance iCT的77.17%;MRI对直肠癌N分期的准确率为86.96%,高于Brilliance iCT的73.91%,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。MRI对直肠癌N分期的灵敏度为95.00%,高于Brilliance iCT的70.00%;MRI对直肠癌N分期的特异度为85.00%,高于Brilliance iCT的75.00%,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 MRI检查对术前诊断直肠癌TN分期的准确率高于Brilliance iCT检查,更具有应用价值。Objective To explore the value of Philips Brilliance iCT and MRI in the preoperative diagnosis of rectal cancer(RC) staging.Methods A total of 92 patients with RC confirmed in the hospital were enrolled.All patients underwent Brilliance iCT and MRI scans before surgery.The examination results of TN staging between Brilliance iCT,MRI and pathological diagnosis were compared.Results Compared with pathological diagnosis,the accuracy rates of MRI in the diagnosis of T staging and N staging of rectal cancer were 89.13% and 86.96%,higher than those of Brilliance iCT(77.17%,73.91%)(P0.05).Conclusion The accuracy rate of MRI is higher than that of Brilliance iCT in the preoperative diagnosis of TN staging of rectal cancer,which is of higher application value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249