纪念史与记忆史:一个学术关系问题的思考  

The History of Commemoration and the History of Memory:Reflections on an Academic Relation

作　　者：郭辉[1] Guo Hui

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学历史记忆与社会意识研究中心,410081

出　　处：《史学理论研究》2022年第5期96-103,159,共9页Historiography Bimonthly

基　　金：湖南省哲学社会科学基金重点项目“湖南抗战记忆史研究”(项目编号:18ZDB020)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在国内外学术史脉络中,纪念史与记忆史有相当密切的关系。尤其是中国学界从记忆史视角研究纪念史,颇有新获。但纪念史研究并非总从记忆史角度观察,而有着独立成派之势,并从研究对象、方法、内容等方面日渐形成自身特色。同时,学界不乏批判之声,纪念史研究陷入某些困境。从纪念史研究已形成的特色,以及来自学界的议论而言,纪念史研究亟需回应处理这些质疑的声音。记忆史视域的思考将提供更多方法论启示,此亦纪念史与记忆史学术关系的应有之义。这将更好地为纪念史研究路径、研究对象、史料来源、问题意识等提供资鉴,有助于纪念史研究更好地发展。In the context of historiography both in China and abroad,there is a close relationship between the history of commemoration and the history of memory. In particular,historians in China have made some new achievements by incorporating commemorative activities into their studies. However,these activities are not always observed in the lens of the history of memory. In recent years,historians that study commemorative activities have been delivered fruitful results and gradually formed their own research characteristics. Most of their findings are more related to commemoration than to “memory”. Its absence of distinction of the history of memory from that of commemorative history has presented the field with many problems. It is urgent to deal with criticisms in a positive way to rethink the relationship between the two. A clearer conceptualization of the history of memory will increase historians’ methodological self-awareness,help them to focus the research objects and select historical materials,and raise their problem consciousness,and so on.

关 键 词：纪念史 记忆史 学术关系 历史感 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]