民法典动产担保登记对抗规则释论——针对“未经登记不得对抗善意第三人”的分析  

Interpretation of Rule of Confrontation by Registration in Chattel Security in the Civil Code:Analysis on“No Confrontation with Bona Fide Third Party without Registration”

作　　者：崔拴林[1] Cui Shuanlin

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院

出　　处：《江海学刊》2022年第5期166-175,256,共11页Jianghai Academic Journal

摘　　要：在《民法典》规定的动产担保登记对抗规则中,若涉及无权处分,则善意第三人之善意的对象就涉及在先权利人和处分人两个方面,第三人无重大过失地“不知处分人无处分权”或“不知有在先物权人”都构成善意。在动产担保权的竞存中,《民法典》第403条与第414条形成法条竞合,此时,应该适用前一条,排除后一条。《民法典》第403条、第641条第2款、第745条规定的“未经登记不得对抗的善意第三人”的范围也应根据第403条而非第414条来确定。In the rule of confrontation by registration of chattel security stipulated in the Civil Code,if unauthorizeddisposal is involved,the object of good faith of the third party in good faith involves two aspects:the prior rightholder and the disposition person.If the third party“does not know that the disposition person has no right todivide”or“does not know that there is a prior right holder”without major fault,it constitutes good faith.Inthe competition of chattel security right,Article 403 and Article 414 of the Civil Code form the concurrence oflegal articles.In this case,the former article should be applied while the latter one should be excluded.Thescope of“bona fide third party”as provided for in Article 403,Article 641(2)and Article 745 of the CivilCode should also be determined in accordance with Article 403 rather than Article 414.

关 键 词：动产担保 登记对抗规则 在先权利人 处分权 善意第三人 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]