论著作权惩罚性赔偿的适用  

On the Application of Copyright Punitive Damages

作　　者：戚笑雨[1] 蔡雨溪 Qi Xiaoyu;Cai Yuxi(Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou,Henan 450046)

机构地区：[1]河南财经政法大学,河南郑州450046 [2]河南财经政法大学民商经济法学院,河南郑州450046

出　　处：《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2022年第3期57-62,共6页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College

基　　金：河南省高等教育教学改革研究与实践一般项目“课程思政视域下问题导向型法学教学创新研究与实践”(2021SJGLX432);河南省知识产权软科学研究计划项目“黄河文化遗产数字化开发利用知识产权问题研究”(20220106017)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：惩罚性赔偿的引入提高了著作权侵权成本,有利于从根本上解决侵权成本低、维权成本过高、诉讼赔偿额低等问题。目前惩罚性赔偿在适用上存在主观“故意”认定标准不够清晰、侵权“情节严重”举证困难等问题。有必要借鉴以主观心理状态为适用标准的英国经验、细化故意标准的美国经验,将“间接故意”纳入惩罚性赔偿的认定标准,降低侵权人“主观故意”的认定难度,提高惩罚性赔偿在司法实践中的可操作性;引入诉前侵权警告制度,降低著作权人的举证难度和维权成本,提高著作权人维权的积极性。The introduction of punitive damages increases the cost of copyright infringement,which is beneficial to fundamentally solve the problems of low cost of infringement,high cost of rights protection,and low compensation for litigation.At present,there are some problems in the application of punitive damages,such as the lack of clear criteria for the determination of subjective“intentional”and the difficulty of proving the“serious circumstances”of infringement.It is necessary to learn from the British experience with subjective psychological state as the applicable standard,the American experience with refined intentional standards,to include“indirect intentional”in the determination standard of punitive damages,and to reduce the“subjective intentional”of the infringe.It can improve the operation ability of punitive damages in judicial practice;introduce a pre-litigation infringement warning system to reduce the difficulty of proof and the cost of rights protection for copyright owners,and increase the enthusiasm of copyright owners to protect their rights.

关 键 词：著作权侵权 惩罚性赔偿 故意 情节严重 

分 类 号：DF523.1[政治法律—民商法学]