刑事证据法视域下特定未成年人“核准追诉”程序规则研究  

On the Procedural Rules of “Approved Prosecution” by Specific Minors from the Perspective of Criminal Evidence Law

作　　者：王译 WANG Yi(School of Law,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 411105,China;Xiangtan University Anti-corruption Judicial Research Base,Xiangtan 411105,China)

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院 [2]湘潭大学反腐败司法研究基地,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《湖南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第5期80-88,共9页Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家重点研发计划重点专项(2020YFC0832400);湖南省社会科学基金青年项目(20YBQ095);湖南省检察院未成年人检察基地一般项目(20WJJDYB02)。

摘　　要：《刑法修正案(十一)》有条件地降低了未成年人承担刑事责任的年龄,确立了特定未成年人“核准追诉”的程序裁量空间。特定未成年人核准追诉案件具有证据类型固定、证据调查方法有限以及庭外证言笔录缺乏证据能力等特征。检察机关应立足于“人”的证据方法,贯彻“合适成年人在场”原则,优化庭前笔录真实性质证规则,探索检察听证程序的适用空间。办理此类核准追诉案件不仅应明确相对独立的证据规则与证明标准,而且还应改善未成年人参与作证的庭审环境。The XI Amendment of the Criminal Law conditionally reduces the age at which minors bear criminal responsibility, and establishes the procedural discretion space for specific minors to “approve prosecution”. Cases approved for prosecution by specific minors are characterized by fixed types of evidence, limited methods of evidence investigation, and lack of evidence ability of out-of-court testimony transcripts. The procurators should base themselves on the evidence method of “people”, implement the principle of “suitable adults present”, optimize the rules of cross-examination of the authenticity of pre-trial transcripts, and explore the applicable space of procurator hearing procedures. In handling such approved prosecution cases, we should not only clarify the relatively independent evidence rules and standards, but also improve the trial environment for minors to participate in the testimony.

关 键 词：特定未成年人 核准追诉 合适成年人在场 庭外调查 恶意补足年龄规则 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]