检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:耿可 俞超[1] 高春华[1] 刘胜楠 周利 朱彬彬 王旦 林燕[1] GENG Ke;YU Chao;GAO Chunhua;Liu Shengnan;ZHOU Li;ZHU Binbin;WANG Dan;LIN Yan
机构地区:[1]浙江大学医学院附属第一医院余杭综合监护室2~3,杭州市310000
出 处:《中华护理教育》2022年第10期927-932,共6页Chinese Journal of Nursing Education
基 金:浙江大学医学院附属第一医院护理科研项目青年孵化基金(2022QF019)。
摘 要:目的引进并汉化ICU护士感知压力源量表并检验其信效度。方法按照Brislin翻译模式对英文版量表进行翻译和回译,通过预试验对中文版量表进行初步检验。邀请8名护理专家评价量表的内容效度,选取国内多所三级甲等医院的516名ICU护士展开调查,并进行信度分析、探索性因子分析与验证性因子分析。结果中文版量表探索性因子分析共提取7个公因子,累计方差贡献率为62.790%,验证性因子分析显示:χ^(2)/df=2.582,CFI=0.907,RMSEA=0.055,SRMR=0.045,各项拟合指数表现较好。中文版量表总的Cronbach'sα系数为0.972;S-CVI为0.968,I-CVI为0.871~1.000。结论中文版ICU护士感知压力源量表具有良好信效度,可作为评估中国ICU护士压力源的工具。Objective To translate and culturally adapt the Perceived Stressors in Intensive Care Units(PS-ICU),and to test its reliability and validity.Methods The PS-ICU was translated into Chinese and back-translated following the Brislin's model.The translated scale was further revised based on the results of pilot study.An expert panel(n=8)was used to evaluate the content validity of the PS-ICU.Convenience sampling method was adopted to conduct a questionnaire survey on 516 ICU nurses.Exploratory Factor Analysis(EFA)and Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA)were used to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version PS-ICU.Results EFA showed that seven factors shared a cumulative contribution rate of 62.790%.The CFA confirmed that the model fit well withχ^(2)/df=2.582,CFI=0.907,RMSEA=0.055,and SRMR=0.045.The total Cronbach's coefficient of the scale was 0.972,S-CVI of the scale was 0.968,and I-CVI were between 0.871 to 1.000.Conclusion The simplified Chinese version PS-ICU has good reliability and validity.The scale can be used to assess ICU nurses'specific stressors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.74.140