认罪案件控辩协商形态的应然转向——以协商性司法为视角  

Prosecution-and-Defense Negotiation in the Cases of Guilty Plea:Normative Behavior from the Perspective of Consultative Justice

作　　者：梁泽敏 LIANG Ze-min(Institute of Criminal Law,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100089,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100089

出　　处：《湖北工业职业技术学院学报》2022年第5期36-42,75,共8页Journal of Hubei Industrial Polytechnic

摘　　要：控辩协商作为协商性司法理念的体现,在实践中仍呈现出公权力主导的单向实施特征,协商性司法价值尚未被充分挖掘。完善控辩协商需要吸纳协商性司法理念的合理因素,实现交涉互进的实质平衡协商样态的转型。控方职权观念应在对话内核下进行调整,同时搭建独立周善的协商程序体系,注重探索律师实质化参与协商的途径。力求在权力组织类型不变的前提下,将协商性司法之多元价值融入控辩协商,为认罪认罚的实质推进奠定程序正义基础。As the embodiment of the concept of consultative justice,the consultation between prosecution and defense still presents the characteristics of one-way implementation dominated by public power in practice,and the value of consultative justice has not been fully explored.To improve the prosecution and defense negotiation,it is necessary to absorb the reasonable factors of the consultative judicial concept,and make the negotiation substantive,balanced and mutual.The prosecution's authority should be adjusted under the core of dialogue,the consultation procedure system should be improved simultaneously,and attention should be paid to exploring ways for lawyers to participate in substantive negotiations.Efforts should be enhanced to integrate the pluralistic values of consultative justice into the prosecution and defense consultation under the premise that the type of power organization remains unchanged,so as to lay a foundation for procedural justice for the substantive advancement of pleading guilty and accepting punishment.

关 键 词：控辩协商 协商性司法 认罪认罚 协商形态 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]