论认罪认罚案件中的控辩平衡  

Balance between Prosecution and Defense in the Cases of Guilty Plea

作　　者：李宁 LI Ning(Shen Junru Law School,Hangzhou Normal University,Zhejiang 310000,China)

机构地区：[1]杭州师范大学沈钧儒法学院,浙江杭州310000

出　　处：《湖北工业职业技术学院学报》2022年第5期43-49,共7页Journal of Hubei Industrial Polytechnic

基　　金：国家社科基金项目课题“逮捕前置程序研究”(4025C43418031)。

摘　　要：认罪认罚从宽制度实施以来,大部分刑事案件的处理重心由法庭审判程序转向审前控辩双方的量刑协商程序。诉讼效率明显提高的同时,引发了人们对量刑协商程序中公正价值的担忧。司法实践中,鼓励被追诉人在律师尚未介入的侦查阶段认罪认罚、“捕诉合一”内设机构改革、被追诉人知情权立法缺位、值班律师制度不完善等,使双方主体在信息资源方面失衡,被追诉人认罪认罚的自愿性、真实性、合法性难以保障。鉴于此,亟需探索量刑协商程序中控辩平衡的实现路径。Since the implementation of the leniency system,the focus of most criminal cases has shifted from the court trial procedure to the pre-trial sentencing negotiation procedure between the prosecution and the defense.Although the efficiency of litigation has been significantly improved,concerns about the fair value of the sentencing consultation process arise.In judicial practice,the accused is encouraged to admit guilt and punishment in the investigation stage when lawyers have not yet intervened,the reform of the internal institutions of"integration of arrest and prosecution",the absence of legislation on the accused's right to know,and the imperfect system of duty lawyers make both parties imbalanced in terms of the information resources,so it is difficult to guarantee the voluntariness,authenticity and legitimacy of the accused's confession.In view of these,it is urgent to explore the ways to achieve the balance between the prosecution and the defense in the sentencing negotiation process.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽 量刑协商 控辩平衡 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]