检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王一禾 顾成博 WANG Yihe;GU Chengbo(Jiangnan University,Wuxi 214000,China)
机构地区:[1]江南大学,江苏无锡214000
出 处:《浙江工贸职业技术学院学报》2022年第3期70-75,共6页Journal of Zhejiang Industry & Trade Vocational College
摘 要:我国刑事诉讼立法对辨认见证人的规定存在分歧。为厘清刑事辨认见证人制度的意义,探讨其在人权法、程序法、证据法上的价值,最终归结于证据法。在证据法视角下,从证据的采纳和采信两个阶段分析辨认见证人的作用,在此基础上探讨刑事辨认笔录采信与见证人制度的内在矛盾。为解决见证人制度无法协助法官采信的问题,归纳由特殊主体担任见证人的改良措施及弊端,建议引入录音录像制度以帮助辨认笔录的证据认定,以期为完善我国的刑事辨认见证人制度提供帮助。China’s criminal procedure legislation on provisions of the eyewitness identification are different. The aim of this paper is to clarify the significance of eyewitness identification in criminal justice and its value in laws including human rights law,procedural law and evidence law, finally boiling down to the value in the evidence law. From the perspective of evidence law, this paper analyzed the role of witness identification from the two stages of evidence acceptance and acceptance, and discussed the internal contradiction between the criminal identification record acceptance and witness identification on this basis. In order to solve the problems that eyewitness identification is unable to assist the judges to establish evidence, this paper summarized the improving measures and shortcomings of eyewitness identified by the special subjects and suggested to introduce the system of audio and video recording to help identify written evidence, in the hope of providing help for the perfection of our criminal witnesses identification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.157.139