诉前约定送达地址的限制思考——兼论《关于进一步推进案件繁简分流优化司法资源配置的若干意见》第3条的适用  

Thoughts on Restrictions of Arrangement of Delivery Address before Litigation——On the Application of Article 3 of Several Opinions on Further Promoting the Diversion of Complex and Simplified Cases and Optimizing the Allocation of Judicial Resources

作　　者：李梦颖 LI Mengying(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200042

出　　处：《广东石油化工学院学报》2022年第5期15-18,共4页Journal of Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology

摘　　要：合法有效的送达为民事诉讼程序不可或缺的一环,诉前约定送达地址本质上属于诉讼契约,具有正当性基础,制度的具体构建应包括约定、效力、救济等方面。诉前约定送达地址应该有一定的限制,并非随便一约,要限制案件类型、认定标准、地址、约定内容以及避免程序资源浪费。Legal and effective service is an indispensable part of the civil litigation procedure.The pre-litigation agreement for the service address is essentially a litigation contract and has a legitimacy basis.The specific construction of the system should include agreement,effectiveness,and relief.The pre-litigation agreement should have certain restrictions on the address for service.It is not a random agreement.It should limit the type of case,the determination standard,the address,the agreed content,and avoid the waste of procedural resources.

关 键 词：送达 诉前约定送达地址 诉讼契约 限制 

分 类 号：D925.11[政治法律—诉讼法学]