“同源异道”和“兼而用之”:先秦时期的儒墨音乐功用思想  

On“Homologous and Heterogeneous”and“Combined Use”:The Functional Thought of Confucian Music in the Pre-Qin Period

作　　者：杜仲赢 Du Zhongying(School of Literature,Heilongjiang University,Harbin 150000,China)

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学文学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150000

出　　处：《黑河学院学报》2022年第9期19-21,共3页Journal of Heihe University

基　　金：2021年黑龙江省高校基本科研业务专项资金项目“屈骚评论与中国文论的现代转型”(2021-KYYWF-0107)。

摘　　要：《礼记·乐记》与《墨子·非乐》从各自所代表的阶层利益中获得理论支点,呈现出异质的音乐功用思想。以往研究认为儒、墨两家关于音乐功用的看法相斥,《礼记·乐记》肯定音乐的教化作用,以“乐和”达至“政和”;《墨子·非乐》则反对“弦歌鼓舞,习为声乐”。以上论争忽略了墨学中的理性架构和社会考量能与儒学音乐教化经验形成互补之势。应以儒墨会通为阐释视角,以墨学“贵兼”的方法论统筹儒家音乐教化经验,勾勒出“道德的音乐”与“功利的音乐”互补的理论路径。The Book of Rites·Book of Music and Mozi·Antimusic obtain their theoretical fulcrum from the class interests they represent,and present a heterogeneous idea of music function.Previous studies have held that Confucianism and Mohism have opposing views on the function of music.The Book of Rites·Book of Music affi rms the educational role of music,and achieves political harmony with“music harmony”;whereas,Mozi·Antimusic opposes to“being encouraged by strings and becoming accustomed to vocal music”.However,the above debate ignores the fact that the rational framework and social considerations in Mohism can complement the education experience of Confucian music.Therefore,we should interpret by including both Confucianism and Mohism,coordinate the experience of Confucian music education by making good use of the methodology of Mohism’s“value of inclusiveness”,and outline a theoretical path that complements“moral music”and“utilitarian music”.

关 键 词：先秦音乐 礼乐教化 儒墨会通 

分 类 号：B21[哲学宗教—中国哲学] G122[文化科学]