经典范畴理论辨析  

Reflection on Classical Category Theory

作　　者：胡永近[1,2] HU Yong-jin(School of Foreign Studies,Suzhou University,Suzhou,234000,Anhui;School of Foreign Studies,Huaibei Normal University,Huaibei,235000,Anhui)

机构地区：[1]宿州学院外国语学院,安徽宿州234000 [2]淮北师范大学外国语学院,安徽淮北235000

出　　处：《蚌埠学院学报》2022年第6期11-14,19,共5页Journal of Bengbu University

基　　金：安徽省教育厅高校科学研究项目(SK2021A0702);宿州学院科研项目(2014yyb12);宿州学院专业带头人项目(2019XJZY21)。

摘　　要：为了探析经典范畴理论的完善路径,在总结该理论遭遇的诘难基础上,指出后世对它进行的批判主要原因在于:研究视角的差异;对其核心理论认知不清,阐述的焦点不同等。从范畴的本质属性、充要条件、二元对立、成员地位、边界、人类认知和模糊现象等角度提出了经典范畴理论的释疑与反批判,进而从范畴的本质、充要特征和范畴之间的关系三个方面对该理论进行了反思,提出了新的研究课题。最后指出:经典范畴理论需要随着人类社会的进步而丰富和完善,才能对新生事物做出更科学合理的解释。It aimed to analyze the way of perfecting the Classical Category Theory in this paper.Based on the criticisms the theory has been facing,the reasons were pointed out as:the differences between the perspectives of study,the vague interpretation of the theory and the differences between the focuses.Then,the disabusing and anti-criticism of the theory were proposed from the perspectives of essential characters,necessary and sufficient condition,binary opposition,position of members,boundary,cognition and fuzziness of category.Reflecting on the essence of category,necessary and sufficient condition and relationship among categories,it pointed out that with the development of society,Classical Category Theory needs further perfection to explain new phenomenon reasonably.

关 键 词：经典范畴理论 路径 释疑 辨析 

分 类 号：D90-059[政治法律—法学理论]