名动包含理论存在逻辑问题吗?  

Are There Any Logical Problems with the“Noun-verb Inclusion”Hypothesis?

作　　者：孙崇飞[1] SUN Chongfei(School of International Studies,Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 311121,China)

机构地区：[1]杭州师范大学外国语学院,浙江杭州311121

出　　处：《外国语》2022年第5期15-23,共9页Journal of Foreign Languages

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“英汉语言单位形-义关系类型的神经认知研究”(19CYY020)。

摘　　要：文章对金立鑫(2022)“‘名包动’理论的逻辑问题”一文提出商榷。讨论的问题主要涉及:西方逻辑学推崇的“甲乙分立”格局和逻辑三段论能否“套”得住汉语?名动包含理论是否违反逻辑公理和三段论推理规则?借此澄清学界对汉语名动包含理论的误解,并提出我们的看法。This paper is intended to discuss the issues raised in Jin Lixin’s recent article appearing in Journal of Foreign Languages as to whether there are logical problems with the“Noun-verb Inclusion”hypothesis.It is mainly concerned with whether the true nature of Chinese can be accounted for in terms of the“Separation of A and B”pattern and the logical syllogism advocated by the Western logicians,and whether the“Noun-verb Inclusion”hypothesis violates the logical axiom and the inference rules cherished by the logical syllogism.It aims to clarify some misinterpretations and presents the author’s position as well.

关 键 词：名动包含理论 甲乙分立 逻辑三段论 对举思维 两点论 

分 类 号：H04[语言文字—语言学]