检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王丽丽[1,2,3] 张宁 WANG Lili;ZHANG Ning(Renmin University of China Libraries,Beijing 100872;Institute of Renmin University Ancient Books Collocation and Studies,Beijing 100872;Research Center for Digital Humanities of RUC,Beijing 100872)
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学图书馆,北京100872 [2]中国人民大学古籍整理研究所,北京100872 [3]中国人民大学数字人文研究中心,北京100872
出 处:《农业图书情报学报》2022年第9期51-59,共9页Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture
基 金:2021—2023年北京高校图书馆研究基金项目“数字人文环境下红色文献共建共享与挖掘利用探析”(BGT2021040)。
摘 要:[目的/意义]数字人文方兴未艾,为古籍知识关联的实现提供了重要现代科技手段。对古籍内容挖掘与知识关联进行研究,有助于提升古籍资源开发水平与服务质量,推动中华优秀传统文化创造性转化、创新性发展。[方法/过程]通过文献综述和网络调研,梳理数字人文视角下古籍知识关联的研究,探讨古籍知识关联的关键环节,通过古籍知识关联应用举例分析古籍知识关联的壁垒。[结果/结论]数字人文视角下,从文献单元层次的组织深入到知识单元层次的组织,借助数据分析技术、机器学习、可视化技术等,可实现古籍知识关联。古籍知识关联起点是文献组织,基础是古籍数据,本质是知识组织。古籍知识关联可进行方志与家谱挖掘、钤印知识网络发现、特定时期与地域学者研究脉络与交往分析等,但在实施中仍面临知识元处理难度大、技术要求高、集成平台少等壁垒。[Purpose/Significance]Chinese ancient books are one of the most important carriers to condense the essence of Chinese traditional culture.However,scholars have found that the database of Chinese ancient books only provides book metadata,which can only meet the basic retrieval and use needs of users,but does not dig and utilize Chinese ancient books in depth from the perspective of knowledge organization.The research in digital humanities is in the ascendant,providing an important modern scientific and technological means for the realization of knowledge correlation of Chinese ancient books.The research on the content mining and knowledge correlation of Chinese ancient books will help to improve the development level and service quality of Chinese ancient books,and promote the creative transformation and innovative development of Chinese excellent traditional culture.[Method/Process]Through literature review and online investigation,this paper summarizes the research of Chinese ancient books'knowledge correlation from the perspective of digital humanities.Based on the research,this paper discusses the differences between traditional database and digital humanistic platforms of Chinese ancient books.First,the organization mechanism is different,and the latter has more diverse and in-depth functions.Second,the scope of collection is expanded.The latter includes not only the original documents,but also the analytical texts and extended documents of ancient books,etc.In the past,most database platforms were"digital"platforms;The digital humanistic platform of Chinese ancient books is a platform of"data",which has been upgraded from"storage"to"analysis"and"correlation".Then,the key links of Chinese ancient books'knowledge correlation are discussed,and the barriers of knowledge correlation are analyzed by examples.[Results/Conclusions]From the perspective of digital humanities,collation of Chinese ancient books has developed from document units to knowledge units by using the data analysis technology,machine learning,vi
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.227.49.178