检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汤维建[1,2,3] TANG Weijian
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院 [2]中国人民大学民商事法律科学研究中心 [3]中国法学会民事诉讼法学研究会,北京海淀100872
出 处:《贵州民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2022年第4期76-104,共29页Journal of Guizhou Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Science
摘 要:我国民事诉讼法所规定的无独立请求权第三人制度具有维权功能、预防功能、解纷功能、民主功能、司法功能等诸多功能,有助于“纠纷一次性解决”程序价值之实现。但该制度在类型设置上缺乏原告型无独立请求权第三人的制度类型,同时对被告型无独立请求权第三人的诉权保护也规范不周,对于辅助型无独立请求权第三人在制度运作上过于强调法院的职权干预作用,无独立请求权第三人的诉讼地位和诉讼权利未能获得应有体现和保障。为此,本文提出了确立原告型第三人制度、完善被告型第三人制度、规范辅助型第三人制度以及赋予相对方异议权制度等修法建言。The system of third party without independent claim as stipulated in China’s civil proceedings has the right-maintaining,preventive,democratic and judicial functions,conducive to the realization of procedural value of"solution to disputes once for all".Nevertheless,this system lacks the institutional type of the third party without independent claim as a plaintiff,does not specify comprehensively the protective measures for the proceeding right of the third party without independent claim as a defendant,shows intervention in over-emphasizing the responsibilities and rights of court in institutional operation,and offers no guarantee for the litigation status and rights of the third party without independent claim.Accordingly,this paper proposes establishing the institution of third party as a plaintiff,improving the institution of third party as a defendant,regulating the institution of third party as an auxiliary,and empowering each other in dissent or dispute.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171