检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨健[1] 魏勇 沈露明 沈百欣[1] 蒋荣江[1] 朱清毅 YANG Jian;WEI Yong;SHEN Luming;SHEN Baixin;JIANG Rongjiang;ZHU Qingyi(Department of Urology,Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing,210011,China)
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学第二附属医院泌尿外科,南京210011
出 处:《临床泌尿外科杂志》2022年第9期676-679,共4页Journal of Clinical Urology
摘 要:目的:比较经脐和经腹膜后2种入路方式行单孔腹腔镜肾部分切除术(laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy,LESS-PN)的围手术期临床效果。方法:回顾性分析2021年7月—2022年4月南京医科大学第二附属医院31例分别经脐(17例)或经腹膜后(14例)入路行LESS-PN肾癌患者的临床资料,比较两组术中手术时间、术中失血量、术后禁食时间及术后住院时间等围手术期临床指标。结果:经脐入路LESS-PN组手术时间为60~150 min,平均(98.8±21.3) min;经腹膜后入路LESS-PN组手术时间为45~120 min,平均(81.4±24.1) min,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.041)。经脐入路LESS-PN组术中出血量为10~300 mL,平均(174.1±87.3) mL;经腹膜后入路LESS-PN组术中出血量为50~350 mL,平均(164.3±102.7) mL;两组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.775)。经脐入路LESS-PN组术后禁食时间为2~6 d,平均(2.71±1.05) d;经腹膜后入路LESS-PN组为术后禁食时间为1~4 d,平均(2.07±0.92) d;两组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.086)。经脐入路LESS-PN组术后住院时间为6~10 d,平均(6.82±1.01) d;经腹膜后入路LESS-PN组术后住院时间为5~9 d,平均(6.36±1.34) d;两组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.278)。结论:经脐和经腹膜后入路行LESS-PN治疗T_(1a)期肾肿瘤均有良好的围手术期效果,可根据肿瘤的具体位置选择合适的手术入路。Objective:To compare perioperative outcomes between transumbilical and retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy(LESS-PN) for renal cell carcinoma(RCC) and to identify the indicators for each approach.Methods:A total of 31 patients underwent transumbilical(n=17) or retroperitoneal(n=14) LESS-PN for RCC in Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from July 2021 to April 2022.The operation time,blood loss during operation,fasting period after surgery and hospital stay were compared between the two groups.Results:The operation time was 60-150 min(a mean of [98.8±21.3] min) for transumbilical approach LESS-PN and 45-120 min(a mean of [81.4±24.1] min) for retroperitoneal approach LESS-PN(P=0.041).The blood loss was 10-300 mL(a mean of [174.1±87.3] mL) for transumbilical approach LESS-PN and 50-350 mL(a mean of [164.3±102.7] mL) for retroperitoneal approach LESS-PN(P=0.775).The fasting period of surgery was 2-6 d(a mean of [2.71±1.05]d) for transumbilical approach LESS-PN and 1-4 d(a mean of [2.07±0.92] d) for retroperitoneal approach LESS-PN(P=0.086).The hospital stay was 6-10 d(a mean of [6.82±1.01] d) for transumbilical approach LESS-PN and 5-9 d(a mean of [6.36±1.34] d) for retroperitoneal approach LESS-PN(P=0.278).Conclusion:Both transumbilical and retroperitoneal approaches can yield satisfactory perioperative outcomes in LESS-PN for RCC in stage T_(1 a).The appropriate surgical approach can be selected according to the specific location of the tumor.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.132.108