近体诗格律的理论阐释  

Theoretical Interpretation of the Meters of Modern Poetry

作　　者：路伟[1] LU Wei(College of Humanities,Honghe University,Mengzi 661199,Yunnan,China)

机构地区：[1]红河学院人文学院,云南蒙自661199

出　　处：《红河学院学报》2022年第6期68-71,共4页Journal of Honghe University

摘　　要：王力和启功是诗律研究的大家。王力诗律学说的起点是“平仄增字理论”,启功诗律学说的起点是“长杆截取理论”。启功的“孤平”理论比王力的更具有解释能力,更符合律诗创作实际。他们都对“一三五不论,二四六分明”口诀进行过批评,但是批评有时显得过于严厉。句式方面,他们的句式理论只是解释体系的不同,在实践中平仄句式的区别都出现在可以不论的第一三两个音节上;篇式方面,他们选用的表述方式虽有差异,实质却完全相同,因此两位大家的诗律理论实质上是一致的。Wang Li and Qi Gong are both masters of poetic research,and their theories are much similar,in which the formulas of“135,246”are criticized,sometimes too harshly.In terms of sentence patterns,their theory of sentence patterns is only different in the interpretation system.In practice,the differences between level and oblique sentence patterns all occur in the first three and two syllables that can be ignored.In the aspect of discourse,their views are exactly the same,so their poetic theory is essentially the same.While“The theory of horizontal oblique increment”makes the starting point of Wang Li’s poetry theory,Qigong’s poetry theory highlights“the theory of long rod interception”.According to my understanding,Qigong’s theory is more explanatory than Wang Li’s and more in line with the actual creation of regulated poems.

关 键 词：诗律 平仄增字理论 长杆截取理论 句式 篇式 

分 类 号：H021[语言文字—语言学]