由“义见微旨”注再论陆淳《春秋微旨》的撰作时间  

Further Discussion on the Writing Time of Lu Chun’s Chunqiu Weizhi from the Annotation of “Yi Jian Wei Zhi”

作　　者：葛焕礼 GE Huanli(Institute of Ancient History,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100101,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院古代史研究所,北京100101

出　　处：《齐鲁学刊》2022年第6期33-44,共12页Qilu Journal

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“宋代《春秋》学史”(15BZS054);国家社会科学基金重大研究专项项目“《春秋》三传学术通史”(19ZDA252)之子课题“舍传求经与兼采三传:从中唐到明末的《春秋》学”。

摘　　要：多种证据表明《春秋微旨》不属于陆淳纂会啖助、赵匡之作而成的著作系列,但它还采用类似《春秋集传》的解经形式,以及对啖、赵经说有着一定程度的依赖,可断定其撰作于大历十年后至陆淳更为独立地撰著《春秋集注》之前。若将《春秋集传纂例》卷七《执放例第二十七》中的“义见微旨”注,理解为陆淳所加的参见其著作《微旨》的说明,则不仅难以圆满解释他何以加之,而且行文多有逻辑不洽之处。此注或出自后世整理、校刻者,或原本为正文,在流传过程中被理解、抄印为注文。它最可能是在陆淳去世后吕温、柳宗元等完善其著作时被加入,其次则是北宋庆历八年朱临刊刻《纂例》之时。Multiple evidences indicate that Chunqiu Weizhi did not belong to the series of works which were compiled from Dan Zhu and Zhao Kuang’ works by Lu Chun. Because this work still adopted the form of interpretation similar to the Chunqiu Jizhuan, and had a certain degree of dependence on the interpretation by Dan Zhu and Zhao Kuang, it can be concluded that it was written after the tenth year of Dali and before Lu Chun wrote Chunqiu Jizhu more independently. If the annotation “Yi Jian Wei Zhi” in the volume 7 “Zhi Fang Examples 27” of Chunqiu Jizhuan Zuanli is understood as Lu Chun’s explanation of referring to his work Chunqiu Weizhi, it is not only difficult to explain how he added it, but also the writing is not logical. This annotation was either added by arrangers and proofreaders of later generations, or was originally the text, which was understood and copied as an annotation in the process of circulation. It was most likely added when Lv Wen and Liu Zongyuan improved Lu Chun’s works after he died, and then when Zhu Lin printed Chunqiu Jizhuan Zuanli in the eighth year of Qingli in the Northern Song Dynasty.

关 键 词：唐代经学 《春秋》学 陆淳 《春秋微旨》 《春秋集传纂例》 

分 类 号：K201[历史地理—历史学]