检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:奉小斌[1] 马晓书 Feng Xiaobin;Ma Xiaoshu(School of Economics and Management,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou 310018,Zhejiang,China;School of Management,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江理工大学经济管理学院,浙江杭州310018 [2]上海大学管理学院,上海200444
出 处:《科研管理》2022年第10期172-179,共8页Science Research Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目:“逆向国际化企业跨界搜索及其绩效提升机理研究:决策导向视角”(71772166,2018.01—2021.12);国家自然科学基金项目:“数字化情境下企业跨界创新的动因、机理与演化研究(72272137,2023.01-2026.12)”。
摘 要:文章整合知识搜索、创新合法性与决策理性理论,以212家制造企业为研究对象,检验了适应式搜索与变革式搜索对创新合法性的影响,以及因果推理和效果推理的调节效应。实证结果表明:适应式搜索和变革式搜索对创新合法性分别有倒U型、U型作用;因果推理增强适应式搜索与创新合法性的关系,而削弱变革式搜索对创新合法性的作用,效果推理的调节作用与之相反;因果/效果双元决策理性正向调节适应式搜索和变革式搜索与创新合法性的关系。In the context of transformation and upgrading, enterprises try to make transformation through innovation in products, processes or business models, but the success of innovation activities is relied on legitimacy. Innovation legitimacy indicates the degree of recognition and acceptance of innovation activities by external stakeholders under the constraints of social norms and other systems. Although the impact of knowledge or resource on innovation legitimacy has attracted much attention, the relevant researches about the effect of knowledge search on innovation legitimacy have been neglected, and the decision-making situation of this impact has not been revealed. Moreover, causal reasoning and effectual reasoning are complementary to each other, but the mechanism differences of the two decision-making rationalities and the integration effect between them need to be further explored. Integrating the theory of knowledge search, innovation legitimacy and decision rationality, this paper constructs the model of adaptive search and transformative search on innovation legitimacy, as well as the moderating models of causal reasoning and effectual reasoning. This paper firstly defines and analyzes the relevant theories and concepts of knowledge search, innovation legitimacy and decision rationality based on the literature review. The conceptual model of knowledge search effects on innovation legitimacy is put forward based on theoretical discussion. Then, data of 212 manufacturing enterprises in Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta are used to testify the research hypothesis with statistical methods, such as correlation analysis, reliability and validity analysis, and multilevel regression analysis. The results show that adaptive search has an inverted U-shaped effect on innovation legitimacy, while transformative search has a U-shaped effect on innovation legitimacy. Causal reasoning strengthens the relationship between adaptive search and innovation legitimacy, but weakens the relationship between transformative
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222