检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王如钰 WANG Ruyu(School of law,People's Public Security University of China,Beijing,100038,China)
出 处:《西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第6期85-90,97,共7页Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:在智慧法院建设及疫情防控背景下,刑事远程审判应运而生并迅速发展。但实践中刑事案件远程审判的适用存在律师辩论效果不佳、庭审实质化落实受阻、被告人诉讼权利保障缺位等问题,如何在远程审判中实现有效辩护成为信息化时代刑事司法的新命题。因此,立足有效辩护理论基础,结合国内外立法现状,通过明确刑事案件远程审判立法地位、增强远程庭审仪式感、强化被告人诉讼权利保障等措施,方能维护控辩平等原则,进而实现有效辩护。Under the background of the construction of smart courts and the influence of epidemic situation,remote trial came into being and developed rapidly.But in practice,the application of remote trial in criminal cases reveals many shortcomings,such as reducing the effect of lawyer's debate,impacting the substantiality of trial,and the absence of the protection of defendant's litigation rights,so how to realize effective defense in remote trial has become a new proposition of criminal justice in the information age.Therefore,on the premise of understanding the theoretical basis and legislative status of effective defense,it is necessary to ensure effective defense from the following aspects:clarifying the legislative status of remote trial of criminal cases,enhancing the sense of trial ceremony,and respecting and protecting the defendant's litigation rights and interests.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.42.179