论司法良知作为刑事裁判说理的道德基点——以“道德恐慌时代”的去罪化共识为视角  

On Judicial Conscience as the Moral Basis Criminal Judgment Reasoning——From the Perspective of the Consensus on Decriminalization in the“Age of Moral Panic”

作　　者：张爽[1] ZHANG Shuang

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学法学院,广州510006

出　　处：《北方论丛》2023年第1期71-79,共9页The Northern Forum

基　　金：2018年度广东省教学研究改革项目“法律人工智能背景下法科生释法说理能力培养:法律批创思维教学实践研究”。

摘　　要：近年来,与“道德恐慌时代”的入罪化诉求相反,社会对于部分犯罪陷入了反向恐慌,达成出罪的高度共识。对于前者,即使不能入罪,刑事裁判凭合法性和公平性也能取得社会认同;而与后者共识相悖的刑事裁判仅此已不能证成其正当性,道德冲突已经从“公平”的职业伦理要求转向“正义”的良知底线,因此动摇了社会的遵法守法意识。为使刑事裁判道德可接受,说理必须以司法良知为道德基点。基于司法论证前提集的饱和要求,刑事裁判说理仅以法教义学诠释为前提是不充分的,司法良知作为说理的基点是刑事裁判社会证立的应有之义,与依法裁判立场并无冲突,也不会损害社会对可预测性的期待。相反,道德理由在教义学诠释传统下的隐而不彰,才是社会对刑事裁判作出否定性道德评价的重要根源。In recent years,the society has fallen into reverse panic about some crimes and has reached a high consensus on committing crimes,which is contrary to the demands of criminalization in the“age of moral panic”.For the former,even if it cannot be convicted,criminal judgments can gain social recognition based on legitimacy and fairness,while criminal judgments contrary to the consensus of the latter can no longer prove its legitimacy.Moral conflict has shifted from the professional ethics requirement of“fairness”to the bottom line of conscience of“justice”,which is shaking the social consciousness of respecting law and abiding by the law.In order to make criminal judgment moral acceptable,reasoning must be based on judicial conscience.Based on the saturation requirement of the premise of judicial argumentation,it is not sufficient for criminal judgment reasoning only to taked dogmatics of law interpretation as the premise.Judicial conscience,as the basis point of reasoning,is the due justice of social proof of criminal judgment,which has no conflict with judgment according to law,and it will not damage the social expectation for predictability.On the contrary,the implicit moral reasons under the tradition of dogmatics interpretation are the important source of the negative moral evaluation of the criminal judgement.

关 键 词：司法良知 习近平法治思想 裁判说理 司法正义 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]