检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张宇航 ZHANG Yuhang(Beijing Yunting Law Firm,Beijing 100102,China)
出 处:《济宁学院学报》2022年第5期41-47,共7页Journal of Jining University
摘 要:认罪认罚制度的目标是实现简案快审,但司法实践中被追诉人认罪认罚后又上诉的情况时有发生,这使得部分适用速裁程序的案件面临着漫长的二审程序。在此背景下,理论界和实务界对是否剥夺或限制被追诉人的上诉权莫衷一是。但上诉权是被追诉人维护自身合法权益的重要救济手段,是刑事诉讼中人权保障的重要举措;因此,有必要保留被追诉人的上诉权。以此为基础完善认罪认罚体制中的上诉机制,才能实现公正基础之上的诉讼效率提升。The goal of the guilty plea and punishment system is to achieve a simple case and a fast trial. However, in judicial practice, the accused pleads guilty and then appeals, which makes some cases that apply the fast trial procedure face a long second trial procedure. In this context, the theorists and practitioners have different views on whether to deprive or restrict the defendant’s right of appeal. However, the right of appeal is an important relief means for the accused to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, and an important measure to protect human rights in criminal proceedings. Therefore, it is necessary to reserve the right of appeal of the accused. On this basis, to achieve the improvement of litigation efficiency on the basis of justice, the appeal mechanism in the system of guilty plea and punishment must be improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.16