检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冀常鹏[1] 王紫瑞 JI Changpeng;WANG Zirui(School of Electronic and Information Engineering,Liaoning Technical University,Huludao 125105,Liaoning,China;Graduate School,Liaoning Technical University,Huludao 125105,Liaoning,China)
机构地区:[1]辽宁工程技术大学电子与信息工程学院,辽宁葫芦岛125105 [2]辽宁工程技术大学研究生院,辽宁葫芦岛125105
出 处:《应用科学学报》2022年第5期876-886,共11页Journal of Applied Sciences
摘 要:石墨烯制备的电解过程具有非线性和不确定性,使用传统的比例积分微分(proportion integration differentiation, PID)控制算法难以精确掌控制备过程中的电解电流以及电解液离子浓度,导致在电解法制备石墨烯过程中,易出现团聚和剥离不均匀的问题,据此设计了一种自适应模糊PID算法并建立相应的数学模型,利用该模型可以更好地控制石墨烯制备的工艺精度。使用MATLAB进行自适应模糊PID算法和传统PID算法的对比仿真,并针对仿真结果进行分析讨论。自适应模糊PID算法的响应时间、抗干扰能力和稳定性等性能相较于传统PID算法都要更加优秀,更加符合石墨烯制备控制系统要求。The electrolytic process of graphene preparation is nonlinear and uncertain.Using the traditional proportional integration differentiation(PID) control algorithm is difficult to accurately control the electrolytic current and electrolyte ion concentration in the preparation process, resulting in the problems of uneven agglomeration and stripping in the process of graphene preparation by electrolysis, Accordingly, an adaptive fuzzy PID algorithm is designed and the corresponding mathematical model is established. The process accuracy of graphene preparation can be better controlled by using the model. The comparative simulation of adaptive fuzzy PID algorithm and traditional PID algorithm is carried out with MATLAB, and the simulation results are analyzed and discussed. The adaptive fuzzy PID algorithm is better in the performs of response time, anti-interference ability and stability, and more in line with the requirements of graphene preparation control system than the traditional PID algorithm.
分 类 号:TN929.53[电子电信—通信与信息系统]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.249.37