认罪认罚具结书效力基准研究——为“契约说”伸张  

A Study on the Effectiveness Benchmark of Affidavit of Guilty Plea’s--Defend the Theory of“Contract”

作　　者：马浩洋 MA Hao-yang(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学,北京100088

出　　处：《北京警察学院学报》2022年第5期17-26,共10页Journal of Beijing Police College

摘　　要：关于认罪认罚具结书的效力基准存有不同的理论主张,“契约说”是当下的主流观点,同时还存有“证据说”“保证书说”“悔过书说”。听取意见模式和家长模式是采用“保证书说”“悔过书说”的代表性观点,但是其在实然和应然层面都不足以取代“契约说”。“契约说”及其背后的协商性司法理念依然是当下最具解释力的理论主张。以“契约说”锚定认罪认罚具结书的效力基准,需要借鉴契约的基本原理,以平等为基准预设认罪认罚的主体间关系,以契约自由和契约正义为基本原则,兼顾我国刑事诉讼的职权主义传统,妥善安排认罪认罚具结书所承载的事实认定与法律适用的效力。There are different theoretical propositions on the validity benchmark of the affidavit of guilt and punishment.The“contract”theory is the current mainstream view,and there is also the theory of“evidence”,“guarantee”and“repentance”.The idea of adopting“guarantee letter”and“repentance letter”represented by“listing opinions model”and“parent model”is not enough to replace the“contract”theory at the level of reality and necessity.The“contract”theory and the negotiated judicial concept behind it are still the most explanatory theoretical propositions.With the“contract theory”anchoring the benchmark validity of the affidavit of guilt and punishment,we need to learn from the basic principles of contracts;presume the relationship between the subjects of pleading guilty and accept punishment on the basis of equality,and take freedom of contract and contract justice as the basic principles;and take into account my country’s criminal proceedings.The authoritarian tradition properly arranges the validity of the fact finding and the application of the law carried by the affidavit of guilt and punishment.

关 键 词：契约 认罪协商 主体平等 契约自由 契约正义 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]