高拱《大学》改本研究  

On the Revision of Gao Gong’s “The Great Learning”

作　　者：陶莎 TAO Sha(Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 611756,China)

机构地区：[1]西南交通大学人文学院,四川成都611756

出　　处：《哈尔滨学院学报》2022年第12期96-100,共5页Journal of Harbin University

摘　　要：高拱《大学》思想主要体现在其著作《日进直讲》与《问辨录》中。《日进直讲》是早年高拱为裕王侍读时所作,其中关于《大学》思想的相关阐发整体没有偏离程朱理学的脉络,侧重强调道德涵养的重要性。《问辨录》是其晚年所作,书中对程朱理学的态度发生了改变,更注重政治实践与实用性,并提出《大学》改本,认为《大学》文本并未出现缺漏,也无经传之说,脉络清晰,自成体系,理解《大学》应不限于“三纲八目”的概念争论。《问辨录》中高拱通过对朱注的逐条辩驳来表达自己对《大学》理解的新释义,体现出他的学术个性,注重内外交养,反对空疏学风,发扬儒家治国的理念。The thought of Gao Gong’s “The Great Learning” is mainly embodied in his works “On Daily Progress” and “Record of Questions and Discriminations”. The former was written by Gao Gong when he was Duke Yu’s classmate in his early years. The related interpretation of the thought of “The Great Learning” did not deviate from the context of Cheng-Zhu’s philosophy as a whole, emphasizing the importance of moral cultivation. The latter was written in his later years. The book changed its attitude towards the Neo Confucianism of Cheng and Zhu, paid more attention to political practice and practicality, and proposed the revision of “The Great Learning”. He believed that the text did not contain any gaps or omissions, nor was there any traditional theory. The context of the book was clear, and it formed its own system. Understanding the work should not be limited to the conceptual debate of “three outlines and eight objectives”. In “Record of Questions and Discriminations”, Gao Gong expressed his new interpretation of “The Great Learning” by refuting Zhu’s notes one by one, which reflects his academic personality, pays attention to the cultivation of both internal and external, opposes the empty style of learning, and carries forward the Confucian concept of governing the country.

关 键 词：高拱 《大学》 《问辨录》 《日进直讲》 治国 

分 类 号：B248.995[哲学宗教—中国哲学]