法秩序统一性视域下的违法性判断——以刑民交叉案件为切入点  

The Proposition of Mitigating Illegal Monism from the Perspective of the Uniformity of Legal Order——Taking the Cross Criminal and Civil Cases as the Starting Point

作　　者：陈惜珍 CHEN Xizhen(Law School,Minjiang University,Fuzhou Fujian 350108,China)

机构地区：[1]闽江学院法学院,福建福州350108

出　　处：《法学论坛》2022年第6期100-106,共7页Legal Forum

基　　金：福建省社会科学基金项目《“截贿”行为的刑法规制研究》(FJ2021BF014);福建省中青年教师教育科研项目(社科类)《“校园网络套路贷”的防范化解机制研究》(JAS20310)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在违法性判断过程中,基于对法秩序统一性的不同理解,存在论与目的论相应地衍生出违法一元论与违法相对论等违法性判断理论,前者又分为严格的违法一元论与缓和的违法一元论。严格的违法一元论在违法性判断上是形式性的,不能进行实质的判断。缓和的违法一元论以二重构造作为违法性判断太过复杂,在实务上没有必要性,其判断意义也值得怀疑。违法相对论以坚持法秩序统一性为前提,通过限制矛盾的目的规范或者确立二者目的的优先性来进行违法性判断。这一判断机理因兼顾法秩序的统一及各自法领域目的的实现而更具合理性。In the process of illegal judgment,based on different understandings of the unity of legal order,ontology and teleology have accordingly derived theories of illegality judgment,the former is divided into strict illegal monism and moderate illegal monism.Strict illegal monism is formal in the judgment of illegality,and can not make substantive judgment.The moderated illegal monism takes the dual structure as the judgment of illegality,which is too complex and unnecessary in practice,and its judgment significance is questionable.On the premise of upholding the unity of legal order,illegal relativity judges the illegality by limiting the contradictory purpose norms or establishing the priority of the two purposes.This judgment mechanism is more reasonable considering the unity of legal order and the realization of the purpose of their respective legal fields.

关 键 词：法秩序统一性 严格的违法一元论 缓和的违法一元论 违法相对论 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]