检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张懂懂 刘洋 熊峰[1] 梅竹 李爽[3] ZHANG Dongdong;LIU Yang;XIONG Feng;MEI Zhu;LI Shuang(College of Architecture&Environment,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610065,China;College of CML Engineering and Architecture,Wenzhou University,Wenzhou 325035,China;School of Civil Engineering,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin 150090,China)
机构地区:[1]四川大学建筑与环境学院,成都610065 [2]温州大学建筑工程学院,浙江温州325035 [3]哈尔滨工业大学土木工程学院,哈尔滨150090
出 处:《振动与冲击》2022年第24期278-286,共9页Journal of Vibration and Shock
基 金:西藏自治区重点研发与转化计划项目(XZ201801-GB-07);国家自然科学基金青年基金(51908384);中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2020M673223;2019M663500);四川省科技计划应用基础研究项目(20YYJC4052);中央高校基本科研业务费(19XJ0015)。
摘 要:当通过人工边界转换方法模拟静动力耦合效应时,既有耦合边界模拟方法存在使模型位移场变化较大的问题,影响地震波斜入射下隧道结构地震响应分析结果的准确性。提出了一种基于多次静力分析的人工边界转换改进方法,使有限元模型动力分析的初始状态与静力分析的应力状态、位移场均一致,实现了静动力联合分析。采用黏弹性边界结合等效荷载的外源波动输入方法,基于ABAQUS软件建立斜入射P波与SV波下的数值地震分析模型,通过算例验证模型与所提方法的可靠性。进行一系列非线性时程分析,对比分析了P波与SV波分别斜入射对隧道衬砌结构地震响应的影响规律。结果表明:该方法可以保证隧道静动力边界转换前后位移的一致性;随着入射角度的增加,P波作用下,结构水平加速度先增大后减小,竖向加速度呈递减趋势,而SV波作用下,水平和竖向加速度均呈增大趋势;当入射角大于20°时,相较于P波斜入射,SV波斜入射下隧道拱肩、拱脚处的应力水平更高;隧道结构在斜入射SV波下的损伤程度高于斜入射P波。The existing coupling boundary simulation method has the problem that the displacement field of the model changes greatly,which affects the accuracy of the seismic response analysis results of a tunnel structures under oblique incidence of seismic waves,while the static-dynamic coupling effect is simulated by the artificial boundary transformation method.In this paper,an improved method of artificial boundary transformation using repeated static analysis was proposed,which makes the initial state of dynamic analysis of the finite element model consistent with the stress state and displacement field of static analysis,and the static-dynamic coupling analysis was realized.A numerical seismic analysis model under oblique incident P wave and SV wave was established using the ABAQUS software.The reliability of the model and the method was verified through an example.A series of nonlinear time-history analysis were carried out,and the influences of oblique incidence of P wave and SV wave on the seismic response of tunnel lining structure were compared and analyzed.Results show that the consistency of displacement displacement field of the tunnel can be ensured in the transformation of artificial boundary by the method.With the increment of the incident angle,the horizontal acceleration of the structure first increases and then decreases.While the vertical acceleration shows a decreasing trend under the action of P wave.Under the action of SV wave,both the horizontal acceleration and the vertical acceleration show an increasing trend.When the incident angle is larger than 20°,compared with P wave oblique incidence,the stress level of the arch shoulder and the arch foot under SV wave oblique incidence is higher;the damage degree of the tunnel structure under oblique incident SV wave is higher than that under oblique incident P wave.
分 类 号:U45[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程] TU47[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.35