解释语法的扩充与兼容——舒斯特曼解释理论探析  

Extensions and Compatibility of Interpretative Grammar——Analysis of Schusterman's Theory of Interpretation

作　　者：杨超迪 宋伟[2,3] YANG Chao-di;SONG Wei(College of Literature,Liaoning University,Shenyang 110136,China;School of Arts,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110167,China;Institute of Humanities and Arts,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China)

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学文学院,辽宁沈阳110136 [2]东北大学艺术学院,辽宁沈阳110167 [3]上海交通大学人文艺术研究院,上海200240

出　　处：《海南开放大学学报》2022年第4期35-44,共10页Journal of Hainan Open University

摘　　要：关于解释问题的讨论是舒斯特曼身体美学的理论前提。在艾略特、马戈利斯与罗蒂等人的启发下,舒斯特曼摆脱了追求客观性的解释一元论。不仅如此,舒斯特曼还立足解释活动在日常生活中的实际发生,以“理解-解释”的理论框架挑战“解释普遍主义”倾向,扩充了解释的语法内涵。与此相继,舒斯特曼着眼于各种解释活动与解释理论的潜在逻辑,从而主张以“逻辑多元主义”的立场使多种解释语法兼容共存。然而,舒斯特曼在提出自身理论的同时,对伽达默尔等其他理论家的批评也存在着一定的误解。Schusterman's semoaesthetic is supported by his thinking about the problem of interpretation.Inspired by Eliot,Margolis and Rorty,Schusterman broke away from the Interpretative monism that pursued objectivity.Schusterman also challenges the tendency of“interpretative universalism”:With the theoretical framework of“understanding-interpretation”and expands the grammatical connotation of interpretation based on the actual occurrence of interpretation activities in daily life.Subsequently,Schusterman focuses on the underlying logic of various interpretive activities and interpretive theories,thus advocating the compatible coexistence of various interpretive grammars from the standpoint of“logical pluralism”.However,there are some misunderstandings in Schusterman's criticism of Gadamer and other theorists when he puts forward his own theory.

关 键 词：舒斯特曼 解释 理解 经验 多元主义 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]