检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国民航大学经济与管理学院,天津300300 [2]中国民航大学交通科学与工程学院,天津300300
出 处:《科技创新与应用》2022年第36期41-44,共4页Technology Innovation and Application
基 金:中国民航大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目(202210059125)。
摘 要:以中国民航机场作为网络节点,机场之间的航线为节点之间的边,构建无向加权网络,采用网络拓扑指标对2011—2021年中国航空货运网络结构进行动态分析,并通过鲁棒性分析研判网络核心节点。研究发现,我国航空货运网络呈现出小世界特性,网络的度中心性呈现拖尾分布,网络整体形成以北京、上海和广州为核心,成都、杭州、昆明和乌鲁木齐为区域枢纽的轴辐式网络结构。结合网络分析结论,该文认为未来我国航空货运网络的发展仍需坚持核心节点建设,并合理规划核心节点的布局。此外,对于货运网络中核心节点即大型货运枢纽(机场)应进一步提高运行效率与风险管控能力,从而提高整个航空货运网络的稳固性。Taking China’s civil aviation airports as network nodes and routes between airports as the edges between nodes,an undirected weighted network is constructed,and the network topology index is used to dynamically analyze the structure of China’s air cargo network from 2011 to 2021,and the core nodes of the network are judged through robustness analysis.It is found that China’s air cargo network presents the characteristics of a small world,the degree centrality of the network shows a tailing distribution,and the network as a whole forms a hub-and-spoke network structure with Beijing,Shanghai and Guangzhou as the core and Chengdu,Hangzhou,Kunming and Urumqi as regional hubs.Combined with the network analysis conclusion,this paper believes that the development of China’s air cargo network in the future still needs to adhere to the construction of core nodes and reasonably plan the layout of core nodes.In addition,for the core node of the cargo network,that is,the large cargo hub(airport),the operational efficiency and risk management and control capabilities should be further improved,so as to improve the stability of the entire air cargo network.
关 键 词:航空货运网络 拓扑结构 聚类系数 中心性指标 鲁棒性
分 类 号:V353[航空宇航科学与技术—人机与环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28