检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李佩佩 LI Pei-pei(School of Law,Hunan Normal University,410081,Changsha,Hunan,China)
出 处:《特区经济》2022年第11期98-101,共4页Special Zone Economy
摘 要:专利纠纷案件管辖制度随知识产权司法制度的发展不断调整和变化。近年来,随着最高法院知识产权法庭、知识产权法院、各城市知识产权法庭的设立,专利纠纷案件的级别管辖从徐徐放宽到逐步收紧,又因不同类型专利案件的级别管辖出现分化,外观设计专利民事案件被视为非技术类案件开始适用更为宽松的管辖制度,基层法院的专利纠纷案件管辖权得而复失、失而复得。知识产权案件管辖进一步集中化,在一定程度上实现跨行政区域集中管辖,专利等技术类案件的上诉机制得到统一。The jurisdiction system for patent dispute cases is constantly adjusted and changed with the development of the intellectual property judicial system.In recent years,with the establishment of the intellectual property court of the Supreme People's Court and intellectual property courts,the level jurisdiction of patent dispute cases has been relaxed to tightened gradually.Design patent civil cases are regarded as non-technical cases and begin to apply a more relaxed jurisdiction system.The jurisdiction of basic people’s courts in patent dispute cases has been lost and regained.The jurisdiction of intellectual property cases has been further centralized,and to a certain extent,the centralized jurisdiction across administrative regions has been realized,and the appeal mechanism of technical intellectual property cases such as patent disputes has been unified.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222