民法典体系下著作权权利配置的范式转换  

Paradigm Transformation of Copyright Allocation under the Civil Code System

作　　者：梁九业 LIANG Jiu-ye(Northeast Normal University)

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学政法学院

出　　处：《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第6期68-78,共11页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：司法部法治建设与法学理论研究项目“人工智能生成内容治理规则的体系化研究”(20SFB3016);吉林省教育厅社会科学研究项目“区块链技术下知识产权全链条保护模式创新研究”(JJKH20221128SK)。

摘　　要：我国著作权法所沿用的“行为设权”的权利配置范式,带有较为明显的技术理性主义的“魅影”和实用主义倾向的烙印,与《民法典》第123条所规定的“专有的权利”之体系价值存在龃龉,并在司法适用中引发了诸多实践难题。为克服“行为设权”范式的不足,应以《民法典》第123条所规定的“专有的权利”为体系依托,充分彰显著作权区别于物权之“直接支配和排他的权利”的独特性,对著作权制度的理论前提“经济人假设”进行必要修正,实现对权利人的激励从“一元”走向“多元”,同时将降低交易成本作为著作权权利配置的平衡支点,并将以利益为核心作为权利规范表达的基本形式,切实促进权利客体效益的最大化和著作权立法目标的真正实现。The right allocation paradigm of“configure rights according to behavior”adopted by the copyright law of China has obvious technical rationalism’s“shadow”and pragmatism tendency,and has discord with the system value of“exclusive rights”stipulated in Article 123 of the Civil Code,which has caused many practical problems in judicial application.In order to overcome the shortcomings of the paradigm of“configure rights according to behavior”,we should rely on the“exclusive rights”stipulated in Article 123 of the Civil Code,fully highlight the uniqueness of copyright from the“direct control and exclusive rights”of real rights,and make necessary amendments to the theoretical premise of the copyright system“economic hypothesis”,so as to realize the incentive for the obligee from“unitary”to“pluralistic”.At the same time,we will reduce transaction costs as the fulcrum of balance in the allocation of copyright rights,and take interests as the core as the basic form of expression of rights norms,so as to effectively promote the maximization of the benefit of the object of rights and the real realization of the goal of copyright legislation.

关 键 词：民法典体系 著作权 权利配置 行为设权 范式转换 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]