检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张震[1,2] ZHANG Zhen(School of Physical Education and Health,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China;Sino-French Joint Research Center of Sport Science,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China)
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学体育与健康学院,上海200241 [2]华东师范大学中法体育科学研究中心,上海200241
出 处:《上海体育学院学报》2023年第1期20-32,共13页Journal of Shanghai University of Sport
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(20&ZD335)。
摘 要:从全球思想史的视角分析总结世界主要国家体育哲学的学科形成、思想的相互迁移与融合以及对体育学的学科贡献。发现:世界主要国家和地区均在20世纪60年代末到90年代完成了体育哲学学科化的初步建设,并呈现逐渐融合与迁移的学科形态,这些研究为体育学奠定了研究的逻辑起点,为体育意义的阐释提供了多元视角与方法论视域。认为:为突破当前体育哲学的研究瓶颈,应基于全球思想史的演变谱系,明确体育哲学对于体育科学建设真正的价值与作用,积极探寻自身特有的知识类型与核心,从身体知、体认、身体显现论等具身认知范式出发,实现自上而下与自下而上的“元实践哲学”融合,使体育学摆脱无学科知识核心的“洋葱交叉学科”困境,从体育的知识核心——训练学、裁判学、竞赛学延伸并探讨其他支脉命题,以体育新问题、真问题为创新导向,进而为体育学科本身逻辑的锚定提供有力支撑。The discipline formation of philosophy of sport in major countries, its concept transformation and fusion as well as the disciplinary contributions to sport studies from the perspective of global intellectual history are summarized. It finds that these countries all completed the initial disciplinary construction of philosophy of sport between the late 1960s and the 1990s, and at the same time showed a gradually disciplinary fusion and migration.These researches laid the logical start for the study of sport and provided a pluralistic perspective and methodological horizon for the interpretation of the meaning in sport. It is concluded that in order to break through the current research bottleneck of the philosophy of sport, it is necessary to clarify the real value and role of the philosophy of sport in the construction of sport science based on the evolutionary genealogy of the global intellectual history, and to actively explore its own unique knowledge types and cores thus to realize the top-down and bottom-up "meta-praxeology", starting from the embodied cognitive paradigms such as bodily knowing, bodily cognition and emersiology, so that the "onion cross-discipline" dilemma for sport science, which has no core of disciplinary knowledge, will be avoided. On the basis above, with the new and real problems oriented, the knowledge cores of sport science, that is, training, coaching and competition, can be extended to other branches,which provides a strong support for the logic of the sport science itself.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68