“未来的文学”——解构理论中关于“巴特比表述”的对话与争锋  

“Future literature”——Dialogue and Contention about “Bartleby’s expression” in Deconstruction Theory

作　　者：吴娱玉 WU Yu-yu

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学中文系,上海200241

出　　处：《求是学刊》2022年第6期156-165,共10页Seeking Truth

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“德勒兹与法国当代文论研究”(22BZW030)。

摘　　要：梅尔维尔制造了一种奇特的巴特比句式,这一表述不肯定也不否定,呈现出一种无法辨认、模棱两可的状态,原有的逻辑线索被迫打断,固有的参照标准失去效力,形成一种思维的空白和裂缝。而这一断裂被诸多解构理论家看作一次革新的契机,德勒兹从中看到了逃逸的解域化运动,阿甘本发现了不作为的潜能,朗西埃挖掘了沉默的价值。他们相互影响,形成对话,最终殊途同归,共同指向一种未来的文学,这是一种背离再现逻辑、反叛理性主体的文学形式,在这里,人物面目全非,语言自说自话,思维断断续续,正是这种少数、不作为、沉默的姿态构成了对主流的反抗,从而获得一种全新的可能。Melville created a peculiar Bartleby sentence pattern. This expression is neither positive nor negative, showing an unrecognizable and ambiguous state. The original logical clues are forced to be interrupted,and the inherent reference standards lose their effectiveness, forming a blank and crack in thinking. This fracture is regarded by many deconstruction theorists as an opportunity for innovation. Deleuze saw the escape of the deconstruction movement from it, Agamben has discovered the potential of inaction, and Rancière has tapped the value of silence. They influence each other, form a dialogue, and finally reach the same goal through different paths. They point to a future literature, which is a literary form that deviates from the reproduction logic and rebels against the rational subject, where characters are disfigured, language speaks for itself, and thought is disconnected, and it is this gesture of minority, inaction, and silence that constitutes a rebellion against the mainstream, thus gaining a new possibility.

关 键 词：梅尔维尔 巴特比 解构理论 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]