治理机制如何差异化影响联盟绩效?——公平识别的选择性中介效应研究  

How Governance Mechanisms Affect Alliance Performance?——Selective Mediating Effects of Justice Perceptions

作　　者：李林蔚 王罡 LI Lin-wei;WANG Gang(Management School,Xian University of Architecture and Technology,Xian 710055;School of Economicsand Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072)

机构地区：[1]西安建筑科技大学管理学院,西安710055 [2]武汉大学经济与管理学院,武汉430072

出　　处：《软科学》2022年第11期138-144,共7页Soft Science

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(71872147);陕西省社会科学基金项目(2020R018);陕西省软科学研究计划(2019KRM013);陕西省教育厅专项科研项目(20JK0210)。

摘　　要：从中介效应的选择性视角出发,借鉴公平理论的研究思路,构建了联盟治理机制通过程序公平和分配公平的差异性中介效应影响联盟绩效的整合研究模型,力图深入治理机制与联盟绩效的关系“黑箱”,揭示其内在作用机理。采用410家联盟企业双份调研数据的实证结果表明,相较于程序公平,契约治理对分配公平的正向作用更强;相较于分配公平,关系治理对程序公平的正向作用更大。有关中介效应的检验结果表明,契约治理通过分配公平而非程序公平的中介作用对联盟绩效产生正向影响,关系治理通过程序公平而非分配公平的中介作用对联盟绩效产生正向影响。From the perspective of selected mediating effects and justice theory, this paper develops an integrated framework that examines how alliance governance mechanisms influence alliance performance through procedural justice and distributive justice, attempting to explore the "black box" of the relationship between governance mechanisms and alliance success. Using 410 Chinese alliance firms with two key informants. Results show that contractual governance has a greater positive effect on distributive justice than on procedural justice. Relational governance has a greater positive effect on procedural justice than on distributive justice. Based on the analysis of mediating effects, results show that contractual governance has a positive impact on alliance performance through the mediating role of distributive justice, while relational governance has a positive impact on alliance performance through the mediating role of procedural justice.

关 键 词：治理机制 联盟绩效 公平识别 

分 类 号：F272[经济管理—企业管理] F271.5[经济管理—国民经济]