刑事印证证明规则的泛化适用:问题与对策  

The Abuse of Criminal Corroboration Rule:Problems and Countermeasures

作　　者：蒋鹏飞[1] JIANG Peng-fei(School of Law,Anhui University of Finance and Economics,Bengbu Anhui 233030,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽财经大学法学院,安徽蚌埠233030

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第11期85-90,共6页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

基　　金：安徽省2019年高校人文社会科学研究项目:论刑事印证证明规则及其适用(SK2019A0517)。

摘　　要：刑事印证证明规则要求某些证据之采信、事实之认定,必须以证据印证为必要条件。在司法实践中,存在着印证证明规则泛化适用的现象,这对实现司法公正有着消极影响。为了解决这一问题,我国应当明确印证证明是刑事证明的重要方法,但并非唯一的方法,应当区分“一般印证”与“高度印证”两种印证程度。另外,还应当根据证据种类、待证事实类别、案件类型、是否适用死刑等因素,确定印证证明规则适用的具体范围及相应的印证程度。Criminal corroboration rule requires that certain evidences must be corroborated as a necessary condition for the admission of evidences and the determination of facts.In judicial practice,there is a phenomenon of abuse of the corroboration rule,which has a negative impact on the realization of judicial justice.In order to solve this problem,China should clarify that corroboration is an important proof method,but not the only one;should distinguish between“general degree of corroboration”and“higher degree of corroboration”.In addition,the specific scope of corroborationrule and the corresponding degree of corroboration should be determined,according to the type of evidences,facts and cases,and whether the death penalty should be imposed,etc.

关 键 词：印证 印证证明规则 自由心证 印证程度 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]