戏剧中的司法:“窦娥冤”悲剧根源的法律证据视角解读  

Analysis on the Causes of Tragedy in The Injustice to Dou E under the Perspective of Testimony

作　　者：史红梅[1] 葛阳 SHI Hong-mei;GE Yang(Research Center of Western Border Disputes Settlement,Huaiyin Normal University,Huaian Jiangsu 223001,China;CWCHU College,Soochow University,Suzhou Jiangsu 215000,China)

机构地区：[1]淮阴师范学院欧美国家边界争端和化解研究中心,江苏淮安223001 [2]苏州大学敬文书院,江苏苏州215000

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第11期95-98,共4页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部规划基金项目(21YJA751023)。

摘　　要：戏剧文本与法律的结合,为透视剧中人物命运、悲喜欢笑的成因研究分析提供了一个崭新的视角,同时对进一步揭示作品中的社会关系和还原社会现实有深刻的研究价值。传统戏剧《窦娥冤》的悲剧根源一般分析主要认为是官吏的贪污腐败、官吏们昏庸无能、遇人不淑及封建统治导致了窦娥被冤屈而被处死。但是纵观情节文本及剧中审判过程,窦娥悲惨命运结局的发生更是由于一系列非常不充分的、值得辩驳的证据信息和科技不发达的传统社会下官员注重自由心证,口供至上的刑讯逼供的粗糙证据制度所致。所以当今的司法改革,对于程序和科学技术手段核心重要性的强调是非常正当和必要的。The link between the drama text and legal system not only provides a new perspective for the research on the fate of heroes and causes of the tragedy but has a significance to return the original shape of the society and the social relations in the work.The causes of traditional tragedy The Injustice to Dou E have been considered due to the corruption and incompetent of the officials,bad guys and the feudal society.However,through the analysis,what causes the tragedy of Dou E is the series of doubtful evidence and rough testimony system,such as too much subjective evaluation of the evidence,confession under torture in ancient society without developed science and technology.Therefore,it is right and necessary to emphasize the importance of the procedure and modern technology in testimony during the judicial reform,which is also the caution from the tragedy The Injustice to Dou E.

关 键 词：戏剧 窦娥冤 悲剧根源 证据视角 

分 类 号：D90-05[政治法律—法学理论] D902[政治法律—法学]