检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张艳芳[1] 黄登红[2] ZHANG Yanfang;HUANG Denghong(Changsha Aeronautical Vocational and Technical College,Changsha 410124,China)
机构地区:[1]长沙航空职业技术学院马克思主义学院,湖南长沙410124 [2]长沙航空职业技术学院机械制造学院,湖南长沙410124
出 处:《江苏高职教育》2022年第5期24-30,共7页Jiangsu Higher Vocational Education
基 金:2019年度湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会课题“新‘民促法’背景下非营利性民办高职治理研究”(编号:XSP19YBZ104)。
摘 要:对于非营利性民办高职的产权及性质问题,经济学界和法学界存在不同的理解,实践中非营利性民办高职的举办者和管理者从各自的角色立场出发,也持不同的态度。由此,非营利性民办高职办学必然面临诸多产权治理困境,关涉产权主体含混不清、产权分割有失公允、产权边界有待厘清等方面。要化解非营利性民办高职治理困境,需要实现三个转向,即将产权治理的话语体系从法律层面转向经济层面;将产权登记的立法体系从法定唯一转向二元选择;将产权治理的约束体系从行政监督转向全面监督。There are different understandings in economics and law circles on the property rights and nature of non-profit private higher vocational education. In practice, the organizers and managers of non-profit private higher vocational education also hold different attitudes from their respective roles. As a result, non-profit private higher vocational education will inevitably face many difficulties in property rights governance, involving ambiguous property rights subject, unfair property rights division, and property rights boundary to be clarified.In order to resolve the governance dilemma of non-profit private higher vocational education, we need to realize three transformations, namely, changing the discourse system of property rights governance from the legal level to the economic level, changing the legislative system of property rights registration from legal uniqueness to dual choice, and turning the restriction system of property rights governance from administrative supervision to comprehensive supervision.
分 类 号:G710[文化科学—职业技术教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.116.179