检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾治辉[1] 张子欣 JIA Zhihui;ZHANG Zixin(Chongqing Institutes of Higher Education Key Forensic Science Laboratory,Criminal Investigation School,Southwest University of Political Science&Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学刑事侦查学院,重庆市高校刑事科学技术重点实验室,重庆401120
出 处:《中国司法鉴定》2022年第6期75-81,共7页Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
基 金:重庆市自然科学基金项目(cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0862)。
摘 要:目的基于对不同书写水平个体正常汉字签名笔迹特征反映特点进行归类研究,发现其笔迹特征反映出稳定与变化、单一与多样和集中与分散的不同规律。方法通过实验分析、归类比对和统计分析,建构起对高、中、低书写水平个体的笔迹特征呈现规律特点,以及形成原因分析的系统方法。结果总体而言,书写水平的高低与笔迹特征的稳定程度、集中程度呈正比,与笔迹特征的单一程度呈反比。结论揭示了不同书写水平人的签名书写习惯不仅具有稳定程度不同的层次差别,而且对分析确定笔迹特征有重要影响。这对正确分析确定不同书写水平笔迹的笔迹特征,合理解释笔迹特征的符合点与差异点,以及判定鉴定意见科学可靠性提供了新的指导。Objective Based on categorization study of the characteristics of normal Chinese signature handwriting of individuals at different writing levels,this paper finds out that the characteristics of handwriting appear to have different patterns of stability and variability,singleness and diversity,and concentration and dispersion.Methods Through experimental analysis,categorization and statistical analysis,the paper established a systematic method to analyze the patterns and characteristics of handwriting written by individuals at high,medium and low writing levels,as well as their formation reasons.Results In general,the writing level was proportional to the stability and concentration of handwriting characteristics,and inverserly proportional to its singleness.Conclusion The results revealed that the writing habits of people at different writing levels appears to be different regarding degrees of stability.On the other hand,the writing habits also have an important influence on the analysis and determination of handwriting characteristics.The paper provides reference for correct analysis of handwriting characteristics at different writing levels,as well as reasonable explanations for the conformity and differences.It will help to determine the scientificity and reliability of forensic expert opinions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3