实质诉讼法的法源论及其现实意义  

On the Legal Source of Substantive Law of Litigation and its Practical Significance

作　　者：陈刚 CHEN Gang(Law School,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006,China)

机构地区：[1]广州大学法学院,广州510006

出　　处：《现代法学》2022年第6期42-57,共16页Modern Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“民事诉讼实体法理论与实践问题研究”(18BFX066)。

摘　　要：民事诉讼法是实质诉讼规范和诉讼程序规范之集合。实质诉讼规范由来于私法体系,在被纳入民事诉讼法之后,并不能改变其法源(法律渊源)出自私法而不是诉讼程序法的史实。实质诉讼概念建立在民法基础之上,但由于立法者没有在制定法中解释这些概念,实践中又存在许多不能直接以民事诉讼法为法源解释和适用这些概念的问题,因而该当依据何种法源解释和适用实质诉讼概念就成为了一项极具理论意义和实践意义的重大课题。目前,在实质诉讼概念的解释方面存在诉讼法说和实体法说的对立,这不仅给司法实践造成困扰,也给建设理论自洽的民事诉讼法及其理论体系造成了巨大困难。因此,重新审视实质诉讼法的法源问题,对于科学把握民法与民事诉讼法的关系,促进民事诉讼法的法典化建设有着十分重要的现实意义。The Civil Procedure Law is a combination of substantive norms and procedural norms of litigation. The substantive norms are derived from the civil law and written down in the Civil Procedure Law, but the historical fact that they come from the civil law rather than the procedural law will not be changed. The concept of substantive litigation is based on the civil law. Because the legislator doesn’t give interpretation to the relative concepts, and in practice these concepts can’ t be applied with the Civil Procedure Law being interpreted as the source of them, it is a both theoretically and practically significant topic to discuss the basis for interpreting and applying the concept of substantive litigation i. e. theory of essence of legal source. There are two opposite arguments for the interpretation of the substantive litigation,one is based on the procedural law and the other is from the view of the civil law, which has brought confusion in practice and difficulty in theory for the construction of the system of civil procedure law.Thus, it is of great practical significance to regain the legal source of the substantive law of litigation for a scientific understanding of the relationship between the Civil Procedure Law and the civil law and an advancement of the codification of the Civil Procedure Law.

关 键 词：实质诉讼法 诉讼程序法 法源 诉讼观 诉权 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学]