检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余冯民 Yu Fengmin(Law School,People’s Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038,China)
出 处:《铁道警察学院学报》2022年第5期94-98,共5页Journal of Railway Police College
基 金:2019年度国家社会科学基金青年项目“辅助证据的证据规则研究”(19CFX044)。
摘 要:在实践中,远程讯问展现出提升司法工作效率、保护生命健康、加强监督、避免刑讯逼供的正向价值,但也存在侵犯犯罪嫌疑人诉讼权利、削弱讯问质量、损害案件信息保密性的问题。为解决远程讯问适用中存在的问题,应明确规定远程讯问案件适用范围、诉讼程序,引入3D“面对面”音视频技术,完善远程讯问软硬件,搭建司法专用内网,从根本上纾解远程讯问在刑事司法和远程信息技术衔接中出现的现实困境。In practice,the remote interrogation has shown positive values of increasing judicial efficiency,protecting life and health,strengthening supervision,and avoiding forced confessions under torture.On the other hand,it may violate litigation rights of the suspects,undermine the result of interrogation,and breach the confidentiality of case investigation.In order to solve the above problems in remote interrogations,it should stipulate the scope of application to remote interrogation cases and litigation procedures,introduce 3D“face-to-face”audio and video technology,upgrade the software and equipment,and build a specific judicial intranet to thoroughly solve the predicaments of remote interrogation cause by the link up with remote IT.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15