《临床药物治疗学》非床旁见习课程教学模式实践研究  

Practical Research on the Teaching Mode of the Non-Bedside-Learning Course of Clinical Pharmacotherapeutics

作　　者：杜广清[1] 赵志刚[2] 陈方煦 李聪颖 席家宁[1] DU Guangqing;ZHAO Zhigang;CHEN Fangxu;LI Congying;XI Jianing(Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University,Beijing,China 100144;Beijing Tiantan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University,Beijing,China 100050;PricewaterhouseCoopers China,Beijing,China 100020)

机构地区：[1]首都医科大学附属北京康复医院,北京100144 [2]首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院,北京100050 [3]普华永道中国,北京100020

出　　处：《中国药业》2023年第2期5-8,共4页China Pharmaceuticals

摘　　要：目的探讨适宜的五年制《临床药物治疗学》非床旁见习课程教学模式。方法以2014-2021学年的慢性阻塞性肺疾病见习课程为例,分别采取以学生为主导的典型病例分析法(典型病例分析组)和情景模拟法(情景模拟组)进行授课,并从理论知识点、疾病药物治疗掌握的知识点、临床思维、慢病管理能力、患者教育、课堂参与度、课后作业等方面评价学生的学习效果。结果典型病例分析法,对教学内容大纲涉猎全面,但学生整体参与度不高;情景模拟法,学生课堂参与度高,主观能动性强,但对教学大纲要求的理论知识点覆盖不全。除2019学年两组得分相同外,其余7年情景模拟组6个方面的学习情况总分均略高于典型病例分析组。总体而言,典型病例分析组理论知识点得分略高于情景模拟组,而临床思维、慢病管理能力、患者教育及课堂参与度得分略低于情景模拟组;两组课后作业得分相当。结论用典型病例分析法和情景模拟法进行《临床药物治疗学》非床旁见习课程授课各有优缺点,相对而言,前者更利于学生掌握疾病及康复药学监护的理论要点和重点,后者更利于培养药学专业人才的团队合作、分析问题和解决问题等方面的能力,教学实践中需根据学生的实际情况适当选择教学模式。Objective To investigate the teaching mode that is suitable for non-bedside learning course of five-year Clinical Pharmacotherapeutics.Methods Taking the internship course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)in the academic year of 2014-2021 as an example,the typical case analysis method led by students(typical case analysis group)and scenario simulation method(scenario simulation group)were used for teaching,and the teaching effects of the two different teaching modes were evaluated from theoretical knowledge points,knowledge points mastered in drug treatment of diseases,clinical thinking,chronic disease management ability,patient education,participation in the classroom,and homework completion.Results In the typical case analysis method,the syllabus was comprehensive,but the overall participation of students was not high.In the scenario simulation method,students had a high degree of participation in the classroom and strong subjective initiative,but the theoretical knowledge required by the syllabus was not fully covered.Except that the scores of the two groups were the same in the 2019 academic year,the total scores of the six aspects of learning in the other seven years in the scenario simulation group were slightly higher than those in the typical case analysis group.In general,the score of theoretical knowledge points in the typical case analysis group was slightly higher than that in the scenario simulation group,while the scores of clinical thinking,chronic disease management ability,patient education and classroom participation in the typical case analysis group were slightly lower than those in the scenario simulation group.The scores of homework completion between the two groups were similar.Conclusion The typical case analysis method and the scenario simulation method have their advantages and disadvantages in the non-bedside learning course of Clinical Pharmacotherapeutics.The typical case analysis method is more conducive to students'mastering the theoretical key points of disease and reh

关 键 词：典型病例分析法 情景模拟法 《临床药物治疗学》 非床旁见习课程 教学实践 

分 类 号：R95[医药卫生—药学]