仲裁裁决执行许可程序的理论基础与现实进路  

The Theoretical Basis and Practical Approach of the Procedure for Enforcement Permission of Arbitral Awards

作　　者：苟应鹏 GOU Yingpeng(School of Law,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China)

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第1期106-114,共9页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基　　金：江苏省研究生科研创新计划资助项目(KYCX22_0016);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关资助项目(20JZD021)。

摘　　要：执行许可是仲裁裁决得以执行的前提,其依据体现在生效法律文书、执行力、强制执行请求权与执行名义的关系上,更与仲裁私法自治与国家公权强制间的张力有关。为体现司法对仲裁的适当监督,仲裁裁决执行许可程序的法律路径应当围绕书面审查进行,而非口头辩论,这不仅契合执行许可的规范价值,更与我国集中式执行体制相得益彰。我国仲裁裁决执行许可程序实际呈现出“债权人申请—法院职权审查”的单线结构,法院只需对仲裁裁决事实进行确认。由于仲裁裁决执行许可程序与执行立案审查混合在一起,在适用上也要调和好它们之间的关系。Enforcement permission is the precondition for the enforcement of an arbitral award.Its basis is reflected in the relationship between the effective legal documents,the enforcement force,the right to claim for enforcement and the name of enforcement.It is also related to the tension between the autonomy of private arbitration law and the enforcement of state public power.In order to reflect proper supervision of the judiciary over arbitration,the legal path of the procedure of permission for the enforcement of arbitral awards should focus on written review,not oral debate,which not only conforms to the normative value of enforcement permission,but also complements the centralized enforcement system in China.The procedure of permission for the enforcement of arbitral awards actually presents a single line structure of“creditor s application-court s power review”,and the court only needs to confirm the facts of the arbitral awards.Since the procedure of permission for the enforcement of arbitral awards is mixed with the procedure of filing for review of enforcement,the relationship between them should also be reconciled in application.

关 键 词：仲裁裁决 执行许可 执行名义 执行力 书面审查 社会公共利益 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]