从数字管理到数字治理:理论、实践与反思  

From Digital Management to Digital Governance: Theory,Practice and Reflection

作　　者：保海旭[1] 陶荣根 张晓卉 BAO Hai-xu;TAO Rong-gen;ZHANG Xiao-hui(School of Management,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China)

机构地区：[1]兰州大学管理学院,甘肃广兰州730000

出　　处：《兰州大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第5期53-65,共13页Journal of Lanzhou University（Social Sciences）

基　　金：国家自然科学基金青年项目“多重环境政策的规制效应与协同策略研究”(72104097);甘肃省哲学社会科学规划项目“甘肃省农村人居环境绩效治理的制度架构、测量节点与改进策略研究”(2021YB011);“欠发达地区政府形象媒体宣传与舆情治理研究”(2021YB162);甘肃省优秀研究生“创新之星”项目“中国农村人居环境政策的变迁逻辑与价值结构”(2021CXZX-167)。

摘　　要：数字时代的背景下,政府正经历从数字管理到数字治理的转型。为了明晰转型过程并发现该过程的范式特点、现实表现和深层问题,基于理论—实践—反思的逻辑对数字管理和数字治理进行整体性分析。研究发现在理论演进视角下,数字管理与数字治理存在情境、特征、功能、技术、理念五个维度的转向,数字治理是对数字管理的继承与发展;在实践发展视角下,二者存在从流程驱动到要素驱动、从事务管理到需求服务、从垂直管理到多元参与的转向,但数字治理并未实现对数字管理的全方位超越。将双重视角结合得到在转型过程中理论与实践存在政府避险避责和选择性执行的政府形态挑战、传统治理惯性影响和数字治理单向度赋能的治理模式风险、技术乌托邦和简化主义的技术逻辑问题三个维度偏差,并进行批判性的偏差反思。In the context of the digital era, the government governance is transforming from digital management to digital governance. To clarify its process and discover the paradigm, the realistic performance and underlying problems, the present paper conducts a holistic analysis of digital management and digital governance based on the“theory-practice-reflection”model. It finds that, while digital governance is the inheritance and development of digital management, from the perspective of theoretical evolu tion, both of them has been developed from the following five aspects: context, feature, function, technology, and philosophy.From the perspective of practical development, the transformation is from being driven by process to being driven by factors, from affairs management to demand service, and from vertical management to diversified participation, but digital governance has not surpassed digital management comprehensively. By combining the dual perspectives, it is found that there are three deviations in the process of transformation in theory and practice, including the government form challenge posed by the government ’s risk and responsibility avoidance and selective implementation, the governance model risk brought by traditional governance inertia and one-dimensional empowerment of digital governance, and the technical logic problem of technological utopia and simplism. Based on the findings, this paper finally reflects on these deviations critically.

关 键 词：数字管理 数字治理 政府形态 治理模式 技术逻辑 

分 类 号：D630[政治法律—政治学]