分离与确立:未决羁押制度的反思与重构  

Separation and Establishment:the Reflection and Reconstruction of the Pre-Trial Detention System

作　　者：卫跃宁 李嘉 Wei Yuening;Li Jia(School of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院刑事诉讼法学研究所,北京100088 [2]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2023年第1期126-136,共11页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

摘　　要：我国尚未确立未决羁押措施的独立地位,仅将其作为适用拘留或逮捕后的附随状态,导致司法实践中出现未决羁押内涵不清、审查失灵和功能异化的问题。对比世界各国的羁押制度,我国应当树立起在人权保障的视野下构建未决羁押制度的理念,注重维护被追诉人在羁押过程中的诉讼权利和期限利益。对我国未决羁押制度进行重构,一方面要厘清阻碍未决羁押制度独立发展的内涵界限,剥离羁押期限与办案期限的混同适用;另一方面要着手构建以比例原则和司法化救济程序为主要内容、以宽严相济的考核方式为辅助机制的制度体系。The independent status of pre-trial detention has not been established in China,so it is only regarded as the accompanying state after detention or arrest,which result in many problems in the judicial practice,such as the unclear connotation,review failure and functional alienation.Compared with the pre-trial detention system in other countries,we should to establish the idea of constructing the system under the vision of human rights protection,and pay attention to safeguarding the litigation rights and time interests of the accused in the course of detention.To reconstruct the pre-trial detention system in China,on the one hand,we should clarify the connotation boundary hindering the independent development of the pre-trial detention system and distinguish the detention period from the case-handling period,on the other hand,we should start to construct an institutional system with the principle of proportionality and judicial relief procedure as the main content and the assessment mode combining leniency and severity as the auxiliary mechanism.

关 键 词：未决羁押 羁押期限 比例原则 逮捕 留置 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]